servius/sukr
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

post(tyranny): upcoming post

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Timothy DeHerrera
2025-09-06 22:52:13 -06:00
parent ceb156c019
commit 44539c9f0c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/blog/no-fault-tyranny.md
View File

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ extra:
repo_view: true repo_view: true
--- ---
> ⚠️ You probably want to wait for the legalese-english translation of this in an upcoming post.
# Preamble # Preamble
What follows is the current draft of my formal civil rights complaint against the State of Colorado, its judicial and prosecutorial entities, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (including the Office of Child Support Enforcement and its Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.). Due to a relentless pattern of obstructions—the latest being a federal judge in Colorado ordering me to refile, demanding dry procedural compliance to non-existent rules in willful ignorance of the escalating emergency nature of the circumstances and the substantive nature of the constitional claims which cannot be ignored (Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 [1972])—I have not yet submitted this updated version to the courts. For this very reason, I intend to pursue a change of venue based on the systemic bias and conflicts detailed herein, which will require navigating the existing case, updating it, and transferring jurisdiction to a more neutral locale, such as the District of Tennessee. What follows is the current draft of my formal civil rights complaint against the State of Colorado, its judicial and prosecutorial entities, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (including the Office of Child Support Enforcement and its Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.). Due to a relentless pattern of obstructions—the latest being a federal judge in Colorado ordering me to refile, demanding dry procedural compliance to non-existent rules in willful ignorance of the escalating emergency nature of the circumstances and the substantive nature of the constitional claims which cannot be ignored (Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 [1972])—I have not yet submitted this updated version to the courts. For this very reason, I intend to pursue a change of venue based on the systemic bias and conflicts detailed herein, which will require navigating the existing case, updating it, and transferring jurisdiction to a more neutral locale, such as the District of Tennessee.