diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 54fbce7..6c3a5f7 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -28,6 +28,18 @@ Most static site generators punt rich content to the browser. sukr doesn't.
 - **CSS minification** — LightningCSS optimization
 - **Monorepo support** — Multiple sites via `-c` flag
 
+## Comparison
+
+| Feature             |    sukr     |  Zola   |  Hugo  | Eleventy |
+| :------------------ | :---------: | :-----: | :----: | :------: |
+| Syntax Highlighting | Tree-sitter | syntect | Chroma | Plugins  |
+| Build-time Math     |     ✅      |   ❌    |   ❌   |  Plugin  |
+| Build-time Diagrams |     ✅      |   ❌    |   ❌   |  Plugin  |
+| Zero JS Output      |     ✅      |   ❌    |   ❌   | Optional |
+| Single Binary       |     ✅      |   ✅    |   ✅   |    ❌    |
+
+See the [full comparison](https://sukr.io/comparison.html) for details.
+
 ## Quick Start
 
 ```bash
diff --git a/docs/content/comparison.md b/docs/content/comparison.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3265cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/content/comparison.md
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+---
+title: "Comparison"
+description: "How sukr compares to other static site generators"
+weight: 10
+---
+
+This page provides a factual comparison of sukr with other popular static site generators.
+
+## Feature Matrix
+
+| Feature                 |      sukr       |  Zola   |     Hugo     |    Eleventy     |
+| :---------------------- | :-------------: | :-----: | :----------: | :-------------: |
+| **Language**            |      Rust       |  Rust   |      Go      |     Node.js     |
+| **Single Binary**       |       ✅        |   ✅    |      ✅      |       ❌        |
+| **Syntax Highlighting** |   Tree-sitter   | syntect |    Chroma    |  Plugin-based   |
+| **Build-time Math**     | ✅ KaTeX→MathML |   ❌    |      ❌      | Plugin required |
+| **Build-time Diagrams** | ✅ Mermaid→SVG  |   ❌    |      ❌      | Plugin required |
+| **Zero JS Output**      |       ✅        |   ❌    |      ❌      |  Configurable   |
+| **Template Engine**     |      Tera       |  Tera   | Go templates |    Multiple     |
+
+## Syntax Highlighting
+
+**sukr** uses [Tree-sitter](https://tree-sitter.github.io/), the same parsing technology used by GitHub, Neovim, and Helix. Tree-sitter builds actual syntax trees rather than matching regex patterns, which enables:
+
+- Accurate highlighting of edge cases
+- Language injection (e.g., bash inside Nix `buildPhase`, JS inside HTML)
+- Consistent results across all supported languages
+
+**Zola** uses syntect, which is regex-based (Sublime Text grammars). It works well for common cases but can struggle with nested languages or unusual syntax.
+
+**Hugo** uses Chroma, a Go port of Pygments. Similar trade-offs to syntect.
+
+## Math Rendering
+
+**sukr** renders LaTeX math to MathML at build time using KaTeX. The output is browser-native — no JavaScript required in the browser. Modern browsers render MathML directly.
+
+**Zola, Hugo, Eleventy** typically require client-side JavaScript (MathJax or KaTeX.js) to render math, or external tooling pipelines.
+
+## Diagram Rendering
+
+**sukr** converts Mermaid diagram definitions to inline SVG at build time. The diagrams are embedded directly in the HTML — no JavaScript library loads in the browser.
+
+**Other generators** typically include the Mermaid.js library and render diagrams client-side, adding ~1MB to page weight and requiring JavaScript.
+
+## When to Choose sukr
+
+Consider sukr if you:
+
+- Want zero JavaScript in your output
+- Need accurate syntax highlighting with language injection
+- Prefer a single Rust binary with no runtime dependencies
+- Value build-time rendering over client-side hydration
+
+## When to Choose Something Else
+
+Consider Zola, Hugo, or Eleventy if you:
+
+- Need a larger plugin ecosystem
+- Require features sukr doesn't have (taxonomies, i18n, etc.)
+- Prefer a more established community with extensive themes
+- Don't care about client-side JavaScript
+
+sukr is intentionally minimal. It does a few things well rather than trying to cover every use case.